I think it is a matter of the personal affair.
What disgusted me is not this tenpin bowling ace Noor Afizal can be freed just because he is a national champion.
Well, it would be fun tobe a champion in sports. You can do anything you like as the law and the stupid judge would protect you when you are running against the law.
Look at those at the Bersih 2, 3. They were charged in the court.
What a rotten jurisdiction in Malaysia.
In short, those participated in the Bersih 2, 3 are no promosing at all. They are not equate to the bowling champion who sit in the room and did nothing for the good of the country. What he could do is a medal.
Does the medal is more important than the free and fair election ?
What a horrifying statement of the legal system in Malaysia.
Speechless and speechless.
But someone in said it differently, of course,coin of a two sides
http://www.malaysiakini.com/
news/205867
she was 13. A 21-year-old man had sex with her. According to the Penal Code, sex with an underaged girl is statutory rape. He pleaded guilty.
Today he is free. All he has to do is fork out RM25,000 and be on his best behaviour for the next five years.
This is the brief of a statutory rape case with an outrageous ruling.
...
Now, let's get to the details. The accused person is national tenpin bowling ace Noor Afizal Azizan.
Taking into account that he is a national champion, the Court of Appeal ruled that a jail term is not in the public interest as Noor Afizal has a promising future.
This is shocking.
When the case was first heard in the Sessions Court, the judge ruled that Noor Afizal must be bound by a five-year term for good behaviour and slapped a penalty of RM25,000 on him. But he also said that it was a consensual act.
Sex with a 13-year-old is consensual? Really? Bollocks. Whatever happened to going by the law?
When the prosecution appealed the case, the High Court ruled that Noor Afizal serve a five-year jail term. But semblance of justice for the victim, a child, remains elusive with the recent ruling.
It's difficult to comprehend the judgment, which can only be described as reckless.
By Charles Santiago
Comments