It is nothing wrong to rebut the false information. But using the sealing statement is to show how weak you are in the mental process. It is similar to those who oppose the euthanisia.
You can often see the supporters of this group of religion, let us put it as I-group. They would comment as :
If you were not the I-group follower, do not comment on the issue. But they went on to criticize other religions. A religion is a philosophical issue. However, someone had made it into a law and even using it as the legal system in the modern days.
How are you going to seal these cybertroppers?
You can ignore them, and do not response to the comment as there is an unequal act in Malaysia to put you into investigation for weeks.
You can also block these cyber troppers, they bring nothing good into your life. There is no equality in Malaysia in religion issue.
Of course, we would love to see the critics of someone in religions as the weakness of that particular religion, they should improve it instead of taking legal action. Why no Buddhism followers take legal action for defamation ? It is because Buddhism is not a religion and it survives for more than 2500 years. As Dalai Lama once said, problem could not be solved by using the perspective of Buddhism, Buddhism should change to adopt the new perspective.
Mental health is the issue to take care of. Religion comes to this perspective but some religions which do not allow the leaving from the group is not helping to save the mental issue.
One day when the act in Malaysia for defamation on religion is taken away, these cyber troppers would hide in the dark corners.
Comments